There is a quiet tragedy to the way we perceive beauty—a tragedy encoded not in the object itself, but in the collective delusion surrounding it. The Substance is not just a meditation on aging, though that is the entry point, the elegant packaging of an idea far more dangerous: the transience of value, the shifting sands of desire, and the tyrannical gaze of the Other.
Once, beauty meant something else entirely. The robust flesh of a Rubens model, the bluish pallor of a Pre-Raphaelite waif, the haughty, androgynous severity of a 1920s garçonne. Each of these was not just a moment but a ruling doctrine. Now, beauty is a death cult, a performance of purity, a morbid fascination with youth—youth, not for its vitality, but for its lack of history, its sheer blankness. The truly beautiful must not only be unlined but unformed, a perfect object onto which desire can be projected.
What The Substance understands, and what makes it profoundly disturbing, is that beauty does not belong to the individual. It is a social construct, a hallucination conjured by collective agreement. One day, a face is desirable; the next, it is discarded, grotesque in its former allure. This is the great horror of the film—there is no self outside the gaze of others, and when that gaze shifts, what was once divine turns monstrous.
But look deeper. Look past the smooth, glistening veneer of youthful flesh, past the anxieties and the clawing desperation. See the thing itself, raw and indifferent. The substance does not care for beauty; it simply is. And that is its heresy, its blasphemy. It reminds us that beauty has always been a lie, a trick of time and perspective. That what we call “aging” is merely the world deciding, arbitrarily, to find something grotesque today that it worshipped yesterday.
This is not about getting old. It is about impermanence, about the slow rot of belief, about the terror of realizing that nothing was ever truly beautiful—only believed to be so. The Substance is not a horror film. It is a document of collapse, a requiem for the fleeting, a mirror held up to the audience and its own flickering, faithless desires. And when you look into that mirror, what do you see
Why don't you write more film reviews? You are very good at it.
Thank you